When Social Media Meets Self-Diagnosis: Navigating Client Conversations

It’s not uncommon these days for clients to walk into session saying, “I saw a video on TikTok, and I think I have…” followed by a list of symptoms or a new diagnosis. Social media platforms—especially TikTok, Instagram, and YouTube—are brimming with mental health content. Some of it is accurate and helpful. Some is oversimplified, misleading, or outright incorrect. For mental health providers, this cultural shift presents both an opportunity and a challenge.

Why Self-Diagnosis is on the Rise

Searching.

Social media’s algorithm-driven feeds are designed to serve up relatable, emotionally charged content. A short, engaging video about ADHD, anxiety, or trauma can resonate deeply with someone who has been struggling without answers.

There are some upsides to this trend:

Decrease.

Reduced stigma: Talking about mental health openly normalizes seeking help.

Idea.

Greater self-awareness: Exposure to mental health terms may help people notice patterns they’ve been ignoring.

Calender.

Motivation to seek care: For some, a social media post is the nudge they need to book an appointment.

But there are also risks:

Thinking.

Overidentification with symptoms: A person may interpret normal human experiences as pathological.

Question mark.

Incomplete or inaccurate information: Complex disorders are reduced to bite-sized lists that lack nuance.

Delay.

Delayed professional assessment: People might rely on self-diagnosis instead of seeking evidence-based evaluation and care.

The Provider’s Role: Balancing Validation and Accuracy

It’s tempting to shut down inaccurate self-diagnoses, but a better approach is curiosity. These moments can be rich opportunities for psychoeducation and therapeutic alliance.

One.

Start with curiosity, not correction.

Ask what resonated about the video or post. Was it a particular symptom? A personal story? The way the creator described coping? This gives you insight into the client’s lived experience and underlying concerns.

Two.

Validate the emotional experience.

Even if the diagnosis is off-base, the feelings or struggles that prompted it are real. Saying “It makes sense that this video caught your attention given what you’ve been feeling” fosters trust.

Three.

Provide accurate, nuanced information.

Offer psychoeducation about the condition in question—what it is, how it’s diagnosed, and how it may differ from what the client is experiencing. Use clear, jargon-free language and provide credible resources.

Four.

Explore functional impact.

Rather than debating labels, explore how the symptoms are affecting the client’s daily life, relationships, or work. This reframes the conversation around practical needs and goals.

Ethical Considerations

  • Avoid dismissiveness: Belittling a client’s source of information can damage rapport.
  • Clarify boundaries: Remind clients that online content is not a substitute for assessment.
  • Protect client autonomy: Educate without imposing; allow clients to arrive at informed conclusions.
Stethoscope heart beat.

Helping Clients Find Reliable Sources

Offer or recommend evidence-based, accessible resources such as:

Encourage clients to use these alongside their therapeutic work rather than replacing it.

Social media isn’t going away. As mental health providers, we can either resist its influence or learn to engage with it in ways that benefit our clients. When approached with openness, these conversations can become bridges—transforming a potentially frustrating moment into an opportunity for education, connection, and empowerment.

References

Apsay, J., & Choudhury, S. (2023). Self-diagnosis in the digital age: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations for mental health care. JMIR Mental Health, 10(1), e43621. https://doi.org/10.2196/43621

Boursier, V., Gioia, F., & Griffiths, M. D. (2020). Do selfie-expectancies and social appearance anxiety predict adolescents’ problematic social media use? Computers in Human Behavior, 110, 106395. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2020.106395

Fleming, T., Bavin, L., Stasiak, K., Hermansson-Webb, E., Merry, S., Cheek, C., Lucassen, M., & Lau, H. M. (2018). Serious games and gamification for mental health: Current status and promising directions. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 9,215. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2018.00215

Luo, C., Li, Y., Chen, A., & Tang, Y. (2021). What triggers online health information-seeking behavior? The role of health anxiety and social media. BMC Public Health, 21, 80. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-10139-2

McCashin, D., Murphy, J., & O’Connor, C. (2021). Social media and suicide prevention: A systematic review. Digital Health, 7, 20552076211024976. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076211024976

O’Reilly, M., Dogra, N., Whiteman, N., Hughes, J., Eruyar, S., & Reilly, P. (2018). Is social media bad for mental health and well-being? Exploring the perspectives of adolescents. Clinical Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 23(4), 601–613. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359104518775154

Blog Post Tags:

Related Blog Posts

Farewell & Gratitude: Reflections from My Time with CASAT OnDemand

Extreme Heat in Nevada: Who’s Most at Risk and How to Stay Safe

Why De-escalation Matters: Creating Safer, Healthier Workplaces for All

Understanding Benzodiazepines: Clinical Use, Risks, and Mind-Body Alternatives for Older Adults

Related Learning Labs

Marijuana

Healthy Aging

Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorders

Enhancing Outcomes for Reluctant Clients with Challenging Issues

Related Resources